Archive for the ‘Achieving success’ Category
How to avoid giving free advice to prospects
I’m reminded of the old sex education message: Just say ‘no’!
As professional advisers we are all used to prospective clients seeking free advice. As I’m no longer in practice and as a frequent blogger I have very different perspective now. So here is some free advice from me. When a stranger/prospect calls you need to set clear parameters. Why give any free advice?
I think the most common reason accountants give themselves is that it helps evidence their credibility, style, approach, knowledge and willingness to help clients. In reality it is only the accountant themselves who doubts their ability and knowledge. The prospect generally takes all that for granted – after all our adverts or website makes clear we’re an accountant. All accountants know everything don’t they? We know this isn’t the case but prospects assume it is so. Even more so if theye have been recommended or referred by a third party.
So accountants are generally proving nothing by giving free advice. They can evidence the other key qualities they want to exhibit without giving free technical advice.
I also tend to think that a side benefit of the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) legislation is that it gives accountants a statutory justification for any apparent reluctance to provide answers to technical questions before engaging a new client. “I’m really sorry Mr Prospect but as a professional adviser I’m precluded by law from giving any advice before we’ve been through the anti-money laundering checks. I know it’s a pain but it’s the law.” The consequence of this will often be that you have engaged the client and secured their agreement to your preferred billing procedures before you give them any valuable advice. So the AML laws do have an upside after all!
Finally I would suggest you establish a process to qualify a prospect or to let them go elsewhere before you waste too much time on them. Initially you may want to qualify out time wasters on the phone. You will also want to determine what you need to cover in an initial meeting.
In many of my seminars I ask accountants if they offer a free initial meeting to prospective clients. Typically the answer is ‘yes’. “How long do you allow for such meetings?” Some put a cap on it. Others say ‘as long as it takes’. I ask the question – “As long as WHAT takes?” It’s not just about getting the prospect to want to appoint you. You need to find out quite early on if they can afford to pay the fees you would want to earn. You also need to determine if this is the sort of person you want to have a client.
Bottom line, I’d suggest you establish a process/checklist (that you will in time commit to memory) to use when you receive such calls in future and indeed when you have an initial meeting with a prospect.
What do you say when you ‘Keep in touch’?
Whether we use online ’social’ networks or we focus on the more traditional communication methods, we know we have to ‘keep in touch’.
If we don’t do this we will be forgotten. When I was younger I used to think that my sparkling personality, wit and conversation would be sufficient to ensure that I would be remembered. Even if I had been right, the fact is that anyone who had met me had probably also met dozens of other people. In time any positive memory of me would be replaced by more recent memories of newer acquaintances.
So what can we do to keep in touch with our contacts/network?
The easy solution – and one I adopt – is to maintain a database of our contacts. At it’s simplest this will be a list on our phone or computer. More sophisticated approaches involve more sophisticated Customer Realtionship Management (CRM) system.
Emails that get through spam filters and which don’t bounce MAY be read by the recipient. Personally addressed emails rather than newsletters are likely to be more successful. If they are read (and that’s a big ‘if’) such emails serve to remind the recipient that we exist. However, the downside of sending emails is that they rarely engage the recipient in conversation. The easiest way to do this is by the good old telephone!
Easy to say of course. So why do so many of us avoid picking up the phone when we know we could. Could some reasons include worrying:
- Who shall I call first?
- It’s a while since we last spoke, will he/she remember me?
- They might be too busy to speak to me now.
- They might not want to speak to me at all.
- I can’t think of a good solid reason to call, beyond ‘How are you?’
If you really are an ambitious professional then whenever you have a genuine business related “reason to call” I’ll bet that a lot of these concerns simply evaporate.
If you can’t think of any genuine reasons yourself let me offer some suggestions:
- “I’m just calling to touch base and see how you’re doing as it’s been a while since we last spoke. How’s business?”
- “I’ve just seen something on the web that I thought you might find of interest”
- “I’ve just read something in [magazine/newspaper] that reminded me of you “
- “May I ask for your advice about something ….”
- “We’re thinking of arranging a reception/party for [selected/ all] contacts and I thought you might have some useful tips”
- “I’m looking for ….. who do you know who …..?”
- “It’s a while since we’ve spoken and I didn’t just want to email you out of the blue.”
- “Have you seen the article about xyz published in ABC? Would you like a copy?”
- “I would like to test out something with you … have you got a few minutes?”
- “Please can I bounce a few ideas off you with a view to exploring who else I should be talking to?”
- “I found our last conversation really valuable; I wanted to thank you again and to let you know what happened ….”
- “I’m calling for no particular reason at all. You just came into my mind and I thought we should catch up …” (works better than you might think – especially as it’s genuine.)
All of the above are just “openers”. You can then continue with:
- “How have things developed with …..?
- “I’m putting together our budgets for rest of the year. Rather than rely on guess work I thought I’d be upfront and ask what the likelihood was that you’ll be needing us?”
- “While we’re talking, what are going to be the key issues / projects for you this year?” etc.
It’s probably best to avoid specifically asking for work but you can end the conversation with something like: “Well, it’s been good talking with you again. Let’s keep in touch, and if there’s anything you ever think I might be able to help you with, don’t hesitate to give me a call.” You must ensure that you don’t sound desperate – even if you are!
The purpose of your call is to keep in touch and to serve your clients, ex-clients and contacts better. You’ll be surprised how many ex-clients will give you some more work – and so will your clients and contacts.
One very good discipline is to set yourself a target of say ten KIT (Keep In Touch) calls a week – that’s just 2 a day . Then count down how many you have left to make. That way the total/target keeps getting smaller and this can help your motivation.
10 key actions you need to take when starting an accountancy firm
These are not the only ten things you need to do, but they may be the most productive:
1 – Draft a business plan
What do you want to achieve in revenues within a year, 2 years, five years? What will you need to do to achieve those objectives and what will be the consequences and cost of doing so? Drafting the plan and incorporating cashflow projections will force you to consider related issues and to plan what actions you will need to take to achieve your objectives. Identify and arrange all relevant business insurances as well. Will you work alone or need admin, secretarial or technical support staff? Will you do everything alone or use a Virtual assistant? Sub-contractors? How will such decisions impact your cashflow projections?
2 – Clarify your service offerings
Will you be servicing private clients? Unincorporated businesses? Partnerships? Limited companies? Everyone/Anyone? (That’s always a mistake by the way). Will you be compliance led or also offering advice? On what subjects do you have the credibility and experience to provide valuable advice?
3 – Draft a marketing plan
How are you going to secure new clients? Where will you go? What will you do? What will you say? What will you spend?
4 – Distinguish yourself
Avoid being seen as just another accountant. Unless you do this you will probably struggle to pick up work from established businesses and from taxpayers who already have an accountant. Your distinction needs to be real and not a figment of your imagination. And it needs to benefit your target clients.
5 – Consider your pricing and billing strategy
Many new firms start by undercutting the competition. This means they build small practices full of cost conscious clients who will never move onto paying commercial fees. Decide whether to set fixed fees for compliance work, value based fees or the more traditional time based charges. Beyond fee levels determine your payment terms – up front, partial upfront, standing orders or only billing after the work is completed with payment due within 7 days? 14 days? 30 days? And what will you do if your payment terms aren’t met? Factor such decisions into the cashflow projections in your business plan.
6 – Target a niche
You will secure more clients faster if you are perceived as having a special focus on a specific niche – be that clients in a specific business type (eg: shop owners, hospital consultants or dentists), or those with specific issues (eg: overseas property, divorce, large family, business start-up)
7 – Clarify the competition
Research online, in local newspapers, directories and in high street. Check out what others are doing, saying and claiming. You may find someone else has a similar focus to you. Their credentials and promises will be different to yours. You will need to understand those differences and whether this offers prospective clients a choice or means you should consider an alternative niche.
8 – Establish commercial processes
From client sign-up through to billing and cash collection. From the production of tax returns, accounts and reports and your IT infrastructure. Will you be happy to work in the ‘cloud’ or will you need hosted applications and backup facilities?
9 – Keep uptodate
Sign up for online and relevant technical updates across all the areas of work you will be doing. If you prefer hard copy updates subscribe to relevant magazines too. Consider your CPD obligations and how you will satisfy these. Many accountants (over 2,000) have registered to receive unique weekly practical tax updates written especially for accountants in general practice.
10 – Identify reliable technical support
Your professional body may provide a helpline facility. You may be able to call on ex-colleagues. And of course there’s the Tax Advice Network where you can source specialist tax advice as and when you or your clients have a tax problem, challenge or issue that goes beyond what you’re uncomfortable dealing with yourself. There’s also a low cost fixed rate Tax Advice Helpline. Register to receive weekly practical tax updates written especially for accountants in general practice.
What else do you suggest needs to be done?
Social media makes it easier for clients to publicise bad service
At 10.30 last night Deb Maddock from Devon posted the following message on twitter:
“Yet again Stupid Accountant David Rice of Plymouth didn’t turn up to our appointment and didn’t let us know. Wasted trip! USELESS #fail”
A quick online search reveals two accountants with that name in that area (or maybe it’s the same guy and he’s moved).
The point though is that until recently, when a client was unhappy with their professional advisers all they had was word of mouth. Conventional wisdom suggests that unhappy people tell ten people for every one person they tell when they are happy with the service they receive.
Social media though makes it much easier for clients to blog, post comments on forums and to tweet about their experiences. And twitter especially provides a real time facility for people to unload and SHARE their frustrations – as well as their delights.
Deb’s post last night may well have been seen by only a fraction of her 600 twitter followers. Or maybe they’ve all seen it. Maybe some have told their friends. Maybe it’s been circulated more widely. Who knows. Playing devil’s advocate, perhaps there’s a good reason for Mr Rice’s non-appearance.
Is there a lesson here for ambitious professionals – beyond the obvious one re keeping appointments?
I have written about twitter here before. Even if you choose NOT to tweet yourself, perhaps the time is coming when you need to have a twitter account to monitor what others are saying about you on twitter? It needn’t be time consuming and it would enable you to respond promptly and to nip problems in the bud. The bigger brands are slowing catching on to this idea too. The way and speed in which they are SEEN to resolve issues can have a positive impact. Indeed such actions can more than compensate for the earlier critical comments. It’s also instructive to be aware of what people are saying about you. I’m not aware of any of the big professional firms who do this (yet).
Another way to monitor what’s being said about you online is to use a free service like Google Alerts. It’s less easy if you have a common name like David Rice (or Mark Lee!) but it can be done.
Any other related tips?
How different do you need to be?
The Telegraph Business club has produced a very professional film about a London based firm of accountants: Lubbock Fine.
As I watched this I initially felt sorry for the firm. Everyone on film was very positive but we could have changed the name of the firm to one of dozens of others and almost every single statement and sentiment being expressed would still have held true. Especially the so-called ‘ground breaking’ reorganisation that resulted in a partner-led one to one service and joined up client services some years ago.
About 3 minutes into the film we learned about some of the firm’s genuinely unique (or at least less common) features – including their expansion into the old eastern block and the fact that over 50% of their clients are based overseas. Also their long term corporate sponsorship and their involvement with other worthy activities.
I was especially taken by Managing Partner Geoff Goodyear’s closing statements (6 minutes in). He talked about the obligations he sees for management to, effectively anticipate changes within the market and the need to “develop some skill sets that may not be available or required at the moment but you anticipate that they will be required in the future”. I would like to think though that this too is the same as all other decent managing partners.
The example inspired by the film prompts me to highlight a number of points that I have mentioned previously on this blog:
- Good professionals need to develop a variety of skills. Effective CPD is about more than simply keeping uptodate technically (see yesterday’s post: What does CPD really mean?)
- Sometimes you don’t need to be different, you just need to communicate what you do more effectively than your competition (and Lubbock Fine’s film is a great example of a firm doing just that);
- Some of the things we think make us different are fallacies. Many firms of a similar size and age find it hard to identify REAL points of difference. In practice though this is probably only an issue in competitive tender situations when comparable firms find it hard to distinguish themselves;
- Lubbock Fine’s website highlights their specialisms in 6 key client areas. Such an approach is bound to be more effective than trying to be all things to all types of clients.
I titled this piece – “How different do you need to be?” What’s your view? How different do you need to be?
Review of the blog 2009
This blog has been a labour of love for well over 3 years now and contains in excess of 300 posts. Many have either come from my talks or have been incorporated into my talks and seminars. As 2009 draws to a close, you may be interested to see this personal choice of my posts over the last 12 months. This has been an interesting review for me as it’s revealed a different way of categorising the subjects I have enjoyed writing about.
Summary
My output here dropped significantly as I only managed 60 posts in 2009. I don’t feel bad about that though as I’ve also written well over 100 pieces for the TaxBuzz blog and posted almost 150 items to the Accountant jokes and fun blog.
Commenting on news items
The year started with me questioning whether it was true that “One in four firms expects to lose clients” and that there would be “A flood of mergers in 2009″ I also suggested that Clients WANT more support in these trying times.
Other such posts in 2009 have addressed:
- The future of compliance services for accountants
- The future of auditing and assurance services
- Two new accountancy consolidators by 2011? I don’t think so
Conventional wisdom
Another theme on the blog this year was to challenge conventional wisdom:
- Why bigger isn’t always best;
- Are your fees high enough?
- What do accountants sell? The answer is NOT ‘time’;
- Do you offer a service guarantee? I bet you do;
- Limited Liability Partnerships – additional protection?
- Do your timesheet procedures reduce new fees?
- Accountants’ adverts are not working any more
- “Added value” – what do you mean?
- Not all Accountants are business advisers
Professional negligence
One of the most popular and frequent talks I’ve presented to groups of accountants over the last few years has been on the risks accountants run and how they can reduce these without tying themselves in knots. Among the related items I’ve posted to the blog this year have been posts titled:
Face to face networking
The importance of effective networking skills is generally recognised but how do we improve our skills in this area? Here’s a selection of my posts offering tips and advice on this subject in 2009:
- Networking strategies for accountants
- Networking strategy – plan your follow up beforehand
- What does Networking have in common with inheritance tax planning?
Social networking
A year ago I wrote a piece explaining why, in my view, Twitter is not for accountants. What I was saying was that accountants need not bother with twitter especially if they think of it as a route to securing new clients. Since then twitter’s popularity has increased and I’ve noted more and more accountants are experimenting with it. As a result I then wrote a number of more positive and helpful pieces which are summarised on the twitter page of this site.
Other related posts this year included:
Top tips
I’ll complete this review of blog posts in 2009 with these reminders of key tips for accountants who are keen to be more productive and more successful:
- Expect more clients to seek advice on Tax Credits
- Why your clients are indifferent and don’t recommend you
- 7 ways to ensure your pitch is not a waste of time
- Why aren’t more accountants talking about LLPs with clients?
- Advising your most important client
- 3 time management tips
- Two top interview tips
- Bookkeeping services and options
- Do as you would be done by….
With all best wishes for the New Year.
Two new accountancy consolidators by 2011? I don’t think so.
I’ve just read a headline suggesting that there will be more listed accountancy firms within 2 years. This follows on from the news of the recent merger of Tenon and RSM Bentley Jennison. There are, apparently, two prospective consolidations in prospect at the moment.
A similar story first appeared on AccountingWeb last March following an announcement by Jobtel that they planned to launch a new consolidator in the UK in 2010. This prompted me, in my then role as Guest Practice Editor, to look back at the successes and failures of previous consolidations in the accountancy marketplace. My piece was titled: Will a new accountancy consolidator be any more successful? I was unequivocal in my view that were major obstacles to overcome.
I remain of that view. To paraphrase my comments in March:
1 - Profit forecasts
Where is the financial incentive for anyone to invest funds in an aggregation of accountancy firms whose profits will shrink post consolidation? Remember all partners’ profits shares will become salaries and subject to 13.8% employers’ NICs. This additional cost will dwarf the hoped for cost savings. If profit forecasts and projections are realistic it’s hard to see a real financial incentive for investors who understand the marketplace.
2 – Partners’ earnings
Again the Employers’ NICs are likely to reduce partners’ prospective earnings in the short-term. Will the hope of capital growth (and it can only be hope) be sufficient compensation for the reduction in drawings and profit shares? I doubt there are many younger and middle aged partners who will willingly forsake their current earnings for prospective capital growth.
The only way around this would be for the consolidated practice to retain some form of LLP structure (as Numerica attempted latterly to introduce). Whether external investors would still be interested in such practice remains to be seen.
Julian Hamilton of Jobtel responded to my comments in March and indicated on the AccountingWeb thread that the partners would receive proceeds from the sale of their goodwill to the new entity and could invest such monies to top up their post consolidation earnings; he also noted that top ups would also come, in time, from dividends paid by the consolidated practice.
3 – International association
Could a new consolidated practice achieve traction without being part of a decent sized international association? Are there any left that do not currently have adequate UK representation? Would a new consolidated practice have sufficient ability to service work referred from overseas or would such expertise need to be recruited – at additional cost?
4 – Management and leadership
This will also be a challenge as has been shown by those who have gone before.
In my AccountingWeb piece I wished Jobtel well (and I still do, though my cynicism remains).
What do you think? Have you ever considered joining a consolidator? What would attract you to the idea?
Do as you would be done by….
One accountant I know advertises his services using what I think is a pretty good message.
He suggests to recipients of his ad that if they do their own tax return it probably costs them far more than they realise. More in terms of the opportunity cost of their time, the hassle, worry and the prospect of making mistakes.
In other words he’s advocating the reasons to use a professional. And he’s right of course.
On the other hand I noticed the same accountant plans to run his own telemarketing campaign. He may have a good reason for doing this but it seems like a big risk to me. It seems he’s going to use untrained staff to make calls, using a script/approach that hasn’t been checked by anyone who understands what works and what doesn’t work when it comes to telemarketing.
Perhaps he has had a bad experience with previous attempts using so-called professional telemarketers. Perhaps they did not have the requiste experience, perhaps the offering was wrong, perhaps the follow up was inadequate, perhaps the pre-meeting confirmation with prospects was lacking, perhaps the accountant needs to develop better ‘closing’ skills. There could be all manner of things to tweak or test.
I suspect that the outcome of a DIY approach to telemarketing will probably cost the accountant far more than they realise. More in terms of the opportunity cost of their time, the hassle, worry and the prospect of making mistakes.
Imagine if someone who has had a bad experience with an accountant decided that all accountants were rubbish and decided to attempt to save money and to complete their own tax returns in future…..
Not all Accountants are business advisers
AccountingWeb recently ran a series of articles about accountants as business advisers. My contribution as Consultant Practice Editor approached the subject from an unusual angle.
There is already plenty of material that seeks to persuade accountants that they need to become better business advisers, and how they could do this.
My article was titled: Do accountants want to be business advisors?
I felt vindicated in my stance both by the comments added by readers and also by the number of times the article was ‘viewed’ – it was consistently running at about 3 times the number of people reading the related piece about ‘How to be a business adviser’.
Here’s an extract:
————
Although many accountants describe themselves as ‘accountants and business advisers’, I have a suspicion that general practice accountants typically fall into one of four camps when it comes to the provision of business advice to clients:
- It’s a no go area: The accountant’s business experience is limited and perhaps they don’t feel that confident with the idea of providing business advice.
- Personal experience: The accountant is willing and able to share their own experiences of business over the years, perhaps drawn in part from working with other clients.
- What others say: The accountant offers advice based on what they have read in books, magazines and websites and possibly what they recall from their studies and from attending seminars and conferences. However, their level of interest in developing this area of skill is much lower than their desire to keep up to date with technical knowledge.
- A systemised approach: The accountant has bought into a programme that assists them in adopting a structured approach to the provision of business advice and either they actively promote the service to their clients or they shy away from doing so and quit the programme.
If I were still in practice I’d like to think that I would probably move up the scale into the fourth category above. Others are happier lower down the scale, and that’s fine as long as their clients are not expecting anything more. Time and again I hear business owners complaining that their accountants fail to provide business and tax advice; they simply do the books, produce tax returns and tell the client how much tax to pay.
Only a relatively small number of accountants seem to be willing to experiment with the systemised approach, however there is plenty of pressure on the others to do this or to beef up their approach and provide business advice, as well as to learn how they can get paid for doing so.
———
Does this resonate with the readers of my blog?
Bookkeeping services and options
I’m aware that many accountants provide bookkeeping services for their clients. In some smaller firms this is all part of the service. In others it’s done more as a necessity when a client’s recordkeeping is based on the practice of ‘we throw all the papers into a bag or box and let the accountants sort it all out for us.”
I think it’s fair to say that many people are confused as they are unaware that anyone can call themselves an accountant (or indeed a bookkeeper). So small business owners do not know whether they need a bookkeeper as well as an accountant. And of course some accountants provide bookkeeping services as part and parcel of their accountancy service. It can be helpful therefore to clarify with clients which approach to bookkeeping will best suit them (and you).
Some accountants are more than capable of writing up a client’s annual accounts and preparing their tax return from a bag or box of what we used to call ‘incomplete records’ when I was training (many years ago!) Other accountants get stuck doing bookkeeping for their clients simply because it’s one of the services offered when the practice began. Is it the most effective solution for the clients? Is it satisfying for the qualified accountant whose expertise stretches way beyond that of a ’simple’ bookkeeper? I mean no offence to bookkeepers here – I simply mean that their training, knowledge and expertise is, by definition less extensive than that of a qualified accountant.
So what are the options for small business owners when it comes to bookkeeping these days? I think there are six alternatives.
- DIY – best only attempted after recieving guidance from an experienced accountant or bookkeeper;
- DIY using an online bookkeeping package such as kashflow;
- DIY using a bookkeeping package on their computer – eg: sage;
- Use a postal service – sending off their monthly invoices and receipts etc to a service provider who writes up their books and then returns all the paperwork by post (eg: this service);
- Engage an independent vetted bookkeeper who knows what they are doing – such as someone provided by this service; or
- Let their accountant write up their books when they produce the annual accounts and tax returns.
Some accountants employ bookkeepers to do the work for clients. Again this probably makes more commercial sense than the accountant undertaking all the bookkeeping themselves – unless they have the time and inclination to do so. Bookkeeping service provided by employed or sub contracted staff made available by the accountant may be the ideal solution – especially once the practice has grown such that the qualified accountant can focus on more rewarding activities themselves.
Historically it was quite common to ignore bookkeeping during the year and to simply produce annual accounts from the papers and records collated by the business owner. This is no longer a sensible course of action – as I explained in a posting on the TaxBuzz blog last year: The end of the old paper bag jobs?
Continuing such an approach may deny the business owner the facility to claim they took ‘reasonable care’ in the event that HMRC identify any careless errors. The new penalties regime became law in 2007 but only really comes into effect as regards tax returns for periods ending on or after 31 March 2009. It’s now the case that where the taxpayer can show they took reasonable care to avoid errors HMRC are no longer allowed to charge penalties as regards consequential underpayments of tax. So effective bookkeeping throughout the year now has another benefit to commend it. And so it makes sense to think through which approach you wish to advocate to your clients. Indeed this may be the perfect opportunity to encourage clients to adopt a more efficient solution than that which they or you may have adopted through default.